Validate mission systems against nation-state tradecraft, continuously, at machine speed.
SIEGE runs as a persistent adversary against federal and national-security environments, built under the DARPA CASTLE program and operationally refined across DoD and U.S. Government programs. It automates red-team operations, validates mission systems, and produces continuous, RMF-aligned evidence for authorizing officials across classified and unclassified networks.
This is how the breach actually happens.
Who's actually coming for you.
Federal mission systems face the most capable adversaries in the world, foreign intelligence services with patience, budget, and intent. SIEGE emulates their campaigns as documented in U.S. Government and allied advisories.
FISMA and RMF ask for proof. SIEGE delivers it continuously.
Federal authorization frameworks all ask whether security controls are effective, not just documented. SIEGE produces continuous, control-level evidence that supports RMF authorization and the move toward continuous ATO.
| Mandate | Requirement | SIEGE Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| FISMA | Effective agency information-security program | Continuous, control-level effectiveness evidence |
| NIST SP 800-37 (RMF) | Assess & authorize / continuous monitoring | Ongoing adversarial assessment supporting cATO |
| NIST SP 800-53 | Security & privacy control baselines | Exploit-ranked validation per control family |
| DoD Zero Trust | Target-level zero-trust activities | Adversarial validation of ZT enforcement points |
| FedRAMP | Cloud service security authorization | Continuous validation of cloud control effectiveness |
Built under DARPA. Validated by DoD.
SIEGE was built under the DARPA CASTLE program and operationally validated across DoD and U.S. Government environments, its agents trained by practitioners with deep cyber-operations pedigree and decades of real cyber-operations experience. For authorizing officials and program offices, SIEGE speaks the language you already use, and proves resilience to the standard your mission demands.
Why continuous beats point-in-time.
Sources: FISMA; NIST SP 800-37 Rev 2 (RMF) & NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5; DoD Zero Trust Strategy; FedRAMP.
Questions teams ask before a SIEGE engagement.
How does SIEGE support FISMA and the NIST Risk Management Framework (RMF)?
Is SIEGE suitable for classified or air-gapped environments?
What is SIEGE's pedigree for national-security work?
How does SIEGE automate red teaming?
See SIEGE run a nation-state campaign against a mission system.
Twenty minutes. We'll show automated red-team operations and the continuous, RMF-aligned evidence your authorizing officials need, no slideware.