Prove your CUI is protected to CMMC 2.0, before your contract depends on it.
SIEGE runs as a persistent adversary against your environment, emulating the nation-state actors that systematically target the Defense Industrial Base for controlled unclassified information (CUI). It validates the 110 NIST SP 800-171 controls behind CMMC Level 2 the way an assessor, and an attacker, actually tests them: by trying to reach your CUI and proving whether your safeguards hold.
This is how the breach actually happens.
Who's actually coming for you.
The DIB is a standing target for foreign intelligence services seeking U.S. defense technology and CUI. SIEGE emulates how these actors actually operate, as documented in U.S. Government advisories.
CMMC asks one question of every defense contractor. SIEGE answers it.
CMMC 2.0 and its underlying frameworks all ask the same thing: can you prove your controls actually protect CUI? SIEGE produces the evidence once and maps it to every requirement your assessor and contracting officer review.
| Mandate | Requirement | SIEGE Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| CMMC 2.0 Level 2 | Assessment against NIST SP 800-171 (110 controls) | Adversarial validation that each control family holds under attack |
| NIST SP 800-171 Rev 2 | Protect CUI across 14 control families | Mapped, exploit-ranked evidence per family |
| DFARS 252.204-7012 | Safeguard CDI; 72-hour incident reporting | Proven detection and response along real attack paths |
| DFARS 252.204-7019/7020 | SPRS self-assessment score | Defensible, evidence-backed scoring, not a paper estimate |
| NIST SP 800-172 | Enhanced protections against the APT | Validation against advanced-persistent-threat tradecraft |
Built under DARPA. Validated by DoD.
When SIEGE confirms your CUI is protected, that finding carries the weight of the DARPA CASTLE program and operational validation across DoD and U.S. Government environments. For your assessor, your contracting officer, and the programs you support, it is the most credible evidence a defense contractor can present, proof your safeguards hold, not a self-attestation.
What a failed assessment actually costs.
Sources: DoD CMMC Program rulemaking (32 CFR Part 170); NIST SP 800-171 Rev 2; DFARS 252.204-7012 / 7019 / 7020 / 7021.
Questions teams ask before a SIEGE engagement.
What is CMMC 2.0 and who needs it?
How does SIEGE help with CMMC and NIST SP 800-171?
Is SIEGE testing safe for production defense networks?
How is SIEGE different from a standard penetration test for CMMC?
See SIEGE walk an adversary to your CUI.
Twenty minutes. We'll map a real attack path to a CUI repository and show you the assessment-ready evidence your C3PAO expects, no slideware.